Radiocarbon dating and creationism dating calling game
C dating of dinosaur fossils, and then, despite his claim that there were 'lots' of them, being treated to him prevaricating and deflecting for several days before failing to provide any such examples even after numerous requests, I decided I would look closer at this claim. Doing it correctly not only means careful decontamination but also understanding its limitations, the major one being the date range over which it is reliable, why this limit exists and, importantly, exactly what carbon you are measuring in the sample and how it got there.To call that tropical is, I think, a rather large overstatement.Also, as the paper linked to just now should indicate, “theorists” do mention that these mammoths were found with vegetation.First, the information on mammoth dates is presented in a table.
This means that the direct quote given in is a pure fabrication.
Given the scans in question are CT scans you would rightly expect that the following examples are CT scans gone wrong.
Radiocarbon dating and creationism comments